Invalid command, these are not costume accountsTime Stone: Funky Dude Sparks, Sawneeks
Mother frumper.Invalid command, these are not costume accounts
:heymonkey:Invalid command, these are not costume accounts
Yes! Lets go!Sorry, my phone died lol
so I received a report with one line item:
“Your target is not Town”
If you change his action I should get another report with either Town or not Town
ExactlyIf I was a lawyer I would say that they weren’t costume accounts at the time the action is taking place but that’s just me
Sorry I was watching 30 rock, I'm canalizing my inner liz lemon.
You would have to check Sparks rangeHow do I know which player was in range of which player then. Don't tell me I'd just get "invalid command"
Damnit Geno
You know Milf Island is a real show nowSorry I was watching 30 rock, I'm canalizing my inner liz lemon.
I'm still waiting for Bitch Hunter.You know Milf Island is a real show now
30 Rock invented
This is actually a better case, you could theoretically start out who is who by doing this under costumes lmaoHow do I know which player was in range of which player then. Don't tell me I'd just get "invalid command"
Damnit Geno
THAT IS UNFORTUNATE AS I WOULD HAVE ADVISED AGAINST IT. IT IS GOOD THAT IT DID NOT WORK AND WE MAY TRY AGAIN INSTEAD OF LETTING IT BE WASTED.Time Stone: Funky Dude Sparks, Sawneeks
I think my partner is the bear, because michael was markedI’ve no idee who is the bear, ephidel, or any of those others.
oh no@Lightning Strikes WOULD GENO ANSWER A QUESTION AS TO A RETROACTIVE USE OF YOUR CARD?
THAT IS UNFORTUNATE AS I WOULD HAVE ADVISED AGAINST IT. IT IS GOOD THAT IT DID NOT WORK AND WE MAY TRY AGAIN INSTEAD OF LETTING IT BE WASTED.
It'd be an invalid command unless they had the card.@Geno if I pick the wrong range do I lose the item or will you tell me it's invalid
Somebody post the meme of spider-man saying "I heard you left out the dash" I can't find itDon’t spell spider-man wrong, just saiyan
Talk about wastage. What exactly makes sawneeks not cop scannable?AGAIN INSTEAD OF LETTING IT BE WASTED.
Is there an item that invalidates modifiers when it comes to targeting? We can bypass jailbirds that way.You can’t target jailbirds, they were untargetable
I'm rules lawyering this
Okay so Zordon is all but claiming Sawneeks right
Cat was marked, Michael was marked. Two marks, same night. I still have the theory that Michael, my partner, is Bear. BUT MICHAEL HAS NOT SAID ANYTHING TO ME THE WHOLE GAME.geno said the time stone has to be used with costume names, not out of costume names, because the game we are currently playing uses costume names. therefore, my part of the equation is solved because you can target me just fine. however, for this master plan to work, we would need to figure out who The Bear is in costume, right?
I think saying you were roleblocked is fine, several people were and everyone can lie about it.@Geno would it be legal to say if you were roleblocked last night? or would that break the rules
Not that that would prove alignment. But anyway. It’s an option.I advise against scanning wee. Wee would likely be willing to prove a role instead.
Cat was marked, Michael was marked. Two marks, same night. I still have the theory that Michael, my partner, is Bear. BUT MICHAEL HAS NOT SAID ANYTHING TO ME THE WHOLE GAME.
NotedI advise against scanning wee. Wee would likely be willing to prove a role instead.
Yeah seems like it'd work if we can figure out Beargeno said the time stone has to be used with costume names, not out of costume names, because the game we are currently playing uses costume names. therefore, my part of the equation is solved because you can target me just fine. however, for this master plan to work, we would need to figure out who The Bear is in costume, right?
Hmm we can still work with this. If someone has an item
I think my partner is the bear, because michael was marked
geno said the time stone has to be used with costume names, not out of costume names, because the game we are currently playing uses costume names. therefore, my part of the equation is solved because you can target me just fine. however, for this master plan to work, we would need to figure out who The Bear is in costume, right?
Or it’s a proximity mark.Cat said they healed Bear. Cat also got marked. Michael got marked. And maybe Sparks?
I don't see any reason to assume Cat and Michael getting marked is linked. I think these are separate things.
I had a theory that the marker can mark their target and everyone that visits said target.Cat said they healed Bear. Cat also got marked. Michael got marked. And maybe Sparks?
I don't see any reason to assume Cat and Michael getting marked is linked. I think these are separate things.
Again, anything regarding the role is ok, this is outside of the role so it's absolutely NOT ok.is this a legal question and can be legally answered. If not don't answer it Zordon
I did not consider this but it's totally valid. I could be condemning Lightning to death if it transfers.Or it’s a proximity mark.
Everyone who touches it gets marked.
That should be considered before watching bear.
Gotcha thank youAgain, anything regarding the role is ok, this is outside of the role so it's absolutely NOT ok.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT SHE WAS NOT TARGETABLE DIRECTLY LAST NIGHT DUE TO ROLE USE. THE MOVED COP SHOT WOULD HAVE BEEN WASTED AS A RESULT.Talk about wastage. What exactly makes sawneeks not cop scannable?
i seeIT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT SHE WAS NOT TARGETABLE DIRECTLY LAST NIGHT DUE TO ROLE USE. THE MOVED COP SHOT WOULD HAVE BEEN WASTED AS A RESULT.
Yeah, but that won't really help if we can't claim who we were once we're back in the proper game thread in D4 (if I understood all these rules correctly).We can always just hail mary it and hope we hit something good, LMAO.
No, but if we get a red check we can just vote them out today.Yeah, but that won't really help if we can't claim who we were once we're back in the proper game thread in D4 (if I understood all these rules correctly).
IF IT WERE ANY OTHER NIGHT I WOULD SAY TO HAVE AT IT. UNFORTUNATELY IT IS NOT THE CASE AND I WOULD RATHER SEE THE COP SHOT USED TO ITS FULLEST.i see
WE WOULD NOT KNOW WHO THAT INDIVIDUAL IS, SADLY. UNLESS WE HAVE A GOOD GUESS AS TO THEIR IDENTITY.We can always just hail mary it and hope we hit something good, LMAO.
No, but if we get a red check we can just vote them out today.
DISREGARD WHAT I SAID. THIS IS CORRECT.No, but if we get a red check we can just vote them out today.
What would probably happen is that if the check hits a jailed player or an out of range player, the shot will just be wasted. That is why I want to people to say if they want to be hit by the cop check or not WITHOUT saying why. We can assume does that didn't say why are either out of range or jailed (Or scum, lol). But it is a start and probably narrow down the list of good hits.That's true. I guess we could keep going through costume accounts if Geno keeps saying "invalid command" until we hit something. It would be a shot in the dark, but better than nothing.
What would probably happen is that if the check hits a jailed player or an out of range player, the shot will just be wasted. That is why I want to people to say if they want to be hit by the cop check or not WITHOUT saying why. We can assume does that didn't say why are either out of range or jailed (Or scum, lol). But it is a start and probably narrow down the list of good hits.
Nah, because just saying "I want to be shot" or "I don't want to be shot" is not specific at all. Is not even close to revealing your identity.You can bet Geno will say "that is too specific hinting, it's mod kill time", based on basically... everything being banned today from being said.
I had a thought that that Q scallywag reminded me o' VereliosVerelios - don't know who this is
then we're probably not using the shot today in that case. im terrible at finding people so it's highly unlikely we find Ephi in here, not to mention the others.This got complicated real quick thanks Geno
I don't really want to fire at any old person or even at a scummy costume because voting their lover out with them feels bad. Sorry I'm sentimental
ooooh, this is a great idea too. the marking hasn't shown itself as bad (YET) but im wary of an arsonist.Heres an option: if we believe michael (or anyone else who was marked for that matter), he was marked last night. That seems like a pretty safe option for me to be able to watch him, as because I have the card range wont be an issue. This would fulfill the double costume requirement
Yeah I think that seems good. I'm gonna check one thing and if that doesn't work I'll do this. If we do this, are you okay with potentially getting marked as well? It is a risk.Heres an option: if we believe michael (or anyone else who was marked for that matter), he was marked last night. That seems like a pretty safe option for me to be able to watch him, as because I have the card range wont be an issue. This would fulfill the double costume requirement
Anything for the good of the town, Minecraft Steve.Yeah I think that seems good. I'm gonna check one thing and if that doesn't work I'll do this. If we do this, are you okay with potentially getting marked as well? It is a risk.
Okay cool, thank you for your service.Anything for the good of the town, Minecraft Steve.
If they don't step forward, which I'd understand them not really feeling indebted to us for reasons, then I'll check the marker.
Ephi changed hers in Scooby Doo 2 so I bet she did againThere is another option to look at/explore to find ephi. Though it's by no means full proof.
Geno said it's okay to discuss this so here it goes. We can look at pronouns and compare with the main thread, now for sure at least two people have changed theirs, but you can see by all the he/hims most of us didn't.
There are only two she/her one being zordon which seems to track. The other is Yami.
Obviously if ephi changed hers for the costume it's not helpful at all. But like thresh (sorian), Niko and IM2 are listed as any. Sorian and pandora were the only anys on the main, so Niko is probably pandora and IM2 changed their pronouns.
Like I don't know how helpful this can be but I thought it might be worth looking at.
I'm a little jealous other people don't risk killing themselves every single time they use there power.I don't see why it couldn't be because you could just lie
*shades of Gnosia everyone is a power role intensifies*
Yeah I changed mine, Michael can confirm, since I asked on the lover thread. They used to be he/him.There is another option to look at/explore to find ephi. Though it's by no means full proof.
Geno said it's okay to discuss this so here it goes. We can look at pronouns and compare with the main thread, now for sure at least two people have changed theirs, but you can see by all the he/hims most of us didn't.
There are only two she/her one being zordon which seems to track. The other is Yami.
Obviously if ephi changed hers for the costume it's not helpful at all. But like thresh (sorian), Niko and IM2 are listed as any. Sorian and pandora were the only anys on the main, so Niko is probably pandora and IM2 changed their pronouns.
Like I don't know how helpful this can be but I thought it might be worth looking at.
y'know, that makes sense with the dayvig and all.
I think the pronoun thing is NAI because anyone could have changed their pronouns to anything, as far as I'm aware. I don't think it specified anywhere it had to be specifically for the character you are cosplaying as