Sawneeks
little green dog
It's okay to summarize, just not direct quoting.Out of curiosity is it ok to ask for a player to provide or summarize the flavor in role PMs?
It's okay to summarize, just not direct quoting.Out of curiosity is it ok to ask for a player to provide or summarize the flavor in role PMs?
so whats the play here?Gotta laugh cause I'd have to place it in this order too. Well actually I don't scum read Green at the moment. But otherwise yeah, this is my list too.
It's okay to summarize, just not direct quoting.
so whats the play here?
I forget if anyone asked this but how come you didn't use it on N1? And why didn't you use it on Rac since he was a potential target last night?
Actually I'm going to question these. Green Ranger, why would you suggest someone should give away a 1-shot vest n1 and Rita why would you? What about Pink made you think they in particular needed that? If you answered this before and I missed it I'm sorry, please just point me to that.i did use it n1.
Actually I'm going to question these. Green Ranger, why would you suggest someone should give away a 1-shot vest n1 and Rita why would you? What about Pink made you think they in particular needed that? If you answered this before and I missed it I'm sorry, please just point me to that.
But your phrasing indicated she should have used it night 1. You were questioning why she didn't.I don't think it's a good move but I still thought it was worth asking.
Interestingly enough, Rita now is saying she used the power N1. Wasn't it strongly implied she used it N2 in her initial claim?
And if she used it N1, that means the lack of night kill is even more confusing. But that's speculation for another day.
I hope this is within the rules.
Rita, you said your command was "give: <playername>"
Is that 100% correct letter for letter?
Actually I'm going to question these. Green Ranger, why would you suggest someone should give away a 1-shot vest n1 and Rita why would you? What about Pink made you think they in particular needed that? If you answered this before and I missed it I'm sorry, please just point me to that.
my sensors are indicating that Rita is telling the truth and is fighting on the side of good.
I hope this is within the rules.
Rita, you said your command was "give: <playername>"
Is that 100% correct letter for letter?
Ah in that case my question is not allowed? I feel like this is entering a grey area.
She said it was n1 and that she panicked an hour before actions locked. I went back and looked but the quote code dosn't seem to want to pick up older things sometimes unless you reply on that page. Said Pink was top town read but seemed to be trying not to be town read?Interestingly enough, Rita now is saying she used the power N1. Wasn't it strongly implied she used it N2 in her initial claim?
And if she used it N1, that means the lack of night kill is even more confusing. But that's speculation for another day.
yes, yes, that's correct
didn't know how scum was going to shoot, and pink ranger was my top town read (well, they weren't scum...) so i used it right before actions were locked.
Now that you mention it, this read should really be down in "weak town reads" or "mixed reads", and not alongside those other three.Blue Ranger: I find this read completely bizarre, are you basing an entire townread(or lean?) on his exchange over the old White Ranger's RNG joke vote? I couldn't think of anything that Blue Ranger had said or done since, but I put that down to me not having paid enough attention and was resolved to fix that after having gone over Zordon's posts, however if this is all you have to townread them with then perhaps there is more to it than that?
I do appreciate you digging deep into the stuff I wrote, though. That gives me positive vibes, even though it's mostly NAI.Quick mention that its fair enough to not townread me given that I've had almost no impact on the game at all so far.
Unrelated, but you may want to go back and check. I think I was a little unclear in the wording but I'm pretty sure the claim has always been that it was used on N1.She said in a later post it was used in N1 but the initial post I thought implied it to be N2 myself.
This conversation we're having right now makes me feel like it's time for another amendment to the community rules :PIt's entering a bit of a grey area. Typically in the past direct quoting means not the flavor or vast majority of the PM in question, when it comes to commands and their specific wording there is not really a restriction on them.
reacting to events as they happened.
but in light of jason flip, need to rethink all my reads.
trini is my top town rn. (****ing irony, how does it work?!)
top town read on n1 when i used it
was too widely town read despite trying not to be town read, so i panicked and used it an hour before actions were locked
no point in hanging onto the information, why would i now that my pr role was wasted? better in the hands of town.
I meant that you seemingly dropped your suspicions close to EoD only to bring them back up again on your very last post, yes. The "didn't point a finger" thing was specifically aimed at the period between your apparent defense of Jason against Bulk and your last Trini-focused posts.I absolutely disagree that I "didn't point a finger" at Jason until the end and I quoted posts where I did when I first answered you but yeah, I will agree my results on scumhunting were apparently pretty lackluster since I was convinced Trini was scum and it's clear she is not. But I guess what you're saying is that I dropped them? Meh, if that's what you're saying I think that's probably fair. I thought you were saying that I didn't mention him at all. I didn't really feel that strongly about him and I was wrong. Like I said, I'll own that. I was wrong but I'm reassessing as the game moves on, not just taking whatever log drifts conveniently by which I think most of the people who followed you seemed to be doing.
Honestly even if it DOES make me look bad you're doing good analysis and I wish more people would step up and not just follow along whether the conclusions are right or wrong. I'm not going to sit here nad say I'm the best player or that I'm always right but I'm going to try to keep digging and if I get lynched at least it will make all the people who followed you on that vote for the flimsiest reasons (or made up reasons, like Black Ranger) look worse and get town closer to solving.
But your phrasing indicated she should have used it night 1. You were questioning why she didn't.
Unrelated, but you may want to go back and check. I think I was a little unclear in the wording but I'm pretty sure the claim has always been that it was used on N1.
am town 1-shot bulletproof giver
and the person i gave it to just left the game
so it was wasted
fml
(AT LEAST THEY WEREN'T SCUM SO HAH!)
Yessss, noticed by the big player today! I'm sorry if I messed up some pronouns for you in those, I wasn't sure how direct a response I should word them as and ended up chopping and changing between a few different levels.Now that you mention it, this read should really be down in "weak town reads" or "mixed reads", and not alongside those other three.
I don't have a strong impression of Blue outside of that debacle. But rereading it yesterday with hindsight in my advantage made me question, why the hell would scum do that? It was either a townie acting weird or scum who had planned the whole thing from the get-go - but it doesn't feel faked either. So they've improved a bit in my eyes.
I do appreciate you digging deep into the stuff I wrote, though. That gives me positive vibes, even though it's mostly NAI.
So you did have the right of it then, I wonder how long it was before she clarified about it being on night 1?Ambiguity here but I thought it meant used on N2.
I never felt like I was defending Jason. I just didn't see Bulk doing much else (and in fact where is he?) and I was curious why that seemed to be his biggest line of thought other than the stuff with you and Black Ranger, but since a few people read it that way I guess that's fair.I meant that you seemingly dropped your suspicions close to EoD only to bring them back up again on your very last post, yes. The "didn't point a finger" thing was specifically aimed at the period between your apparent defense of Jason against Bulk and your last Trini-focused posts.
Ambiguity here but I thought it meant used on N2.
Black ranger improved today, but maybe that's because the pressure is off him for a bit. Between Zordon and Rita. It's Rita for me, I think she ignored everything I said about her. Maybe it's because I didn't put my vote down yet. But she's my strongest scumread atm. For the points mentioned earlier. I'd also like to add that she posts or rather posted a lot, but did she really add anything?
Vote: Rita Repulsa
why weren't you on the jason vote day 2, tommy boy?
Black Ranger, did you answer this? At all?I went through Green's empty posts not once but twice. Once with every single post from the day phase. I also clarified the case to Yellow. This is complete fantasyland bullshit. rac was the only other person to make a case against Green around that vote and it was right at eod - I flagged it. But after the swings to Red/rac and some of the other weird swings yes I was deeply concerned scum was following me on that vote. What you have said here is absolutely untrue. I posted about that too, and explained it. You either missed those posts completely (and there were several on these two topics) or you're just inventing things. And apparently people will just follow without checking the work for themselves.
Not feeling great today (irl) so I'm kinda just reading but not saying much, sorry.
Like I posted earlier, Alpha 5 or Zordon I feel are probably scum. I know I posted in my second post of today that Rita may be scum but I also feel like either Zordon or Rita are probably scum. Not sure about both but at least one of them so if one flipped town, I'd want to go after the other.
Besides that, Tommy may be scum again for the reason I posted here
So half the game suddenly becomes suspicious? I can follow the first part but the second seems like throwing yourself into a deep hole for no reason, especially since people had to weigh RL against voting on d1.
And if it ends up a Goldar situation and like ten people vote for Jason, you will only look at those who don’t? Surely someone would bus regardless.
I just struggle with links this early. Feels manufactured. Whatever Jason’s alignment I don’t see him as the key to the game. Not with the way the thread is limping. Too many unknowns and yet you seem so certain.
Black Ranger, did you answer this? At all?
- But immediately after Skull votes against Jason (#899), Rita votes against Skull (#900) in a move that seemed very disconnected from their Trini tunnel.
You're right, my bad. Skull's post wasn't a vote yet - it was just a strong push against Jason.wait, can you link me these votes? i probably did do something that looks this bad in retrospect, but i wanna see them.
having problems finding the first vote you mentioned, because the final vote count says my vote on skull was before any of the jason votes. o_o
You're right, my bad. Skull's post wasn't a vote yet - it was just a strong push against Jason.
It's entering a bit of a grey area. Typically in the past direct quoting means not the flavor or vast majority of the PM in question, when it comes to commands and their specific wording there is not really a restriction on them.
yes, yes, that's correct
Actually there's only 2ish hours left so I'll spell it out.
"Strong Kill"
"Investigate"
"give"
Nah, it'd have to be "Give" based on the two role PMs we have seen.
Actually there's only 2ish hours left so I'll spell it out.
"Strong Kill"
"Investigate"
"give"
Nah, it'd have to be "Give" based on the two role PMs we have seen.
Otherwise, Black's inconsistent and unhelpful behavior doesn't appear to be in town's interests. If Black was town, I can't really make sense of his adamant refusal to vote defensively.
I...Actually there's only 2ish hours left so I'll spell it out.
"Strong Kill"
"Investigate"
"give"
Nah, it'd have to be "Give" based on the two role PMs we have seen.
Are you saying you think Black Ranger and I could be scum together?So, I am happy with my Zordon vote, but would be okay with a Black Ranger lynch too.
I...
I thought that this exact sort or syntax quippling was the reason that they banned the quoting of role PMs. I don't find it to be a very useful form of analysis, since I don't think you asked Rita for specific capitalization.
I'm glad you could focus on Finster while I was orchestrating a three way tie and getting Goldar out of the game.
Why that post?
rac's post was very clearly directed at Alpha. Black seemed confused by it, and Jason took that opportunity to jump at rac as well.I agree with black ranger. I don’t understand that post either.
that post seems out of place for this discussion
As for that vote yesterday, I thought the pile up on Goldar happened way too quickly but dismissed it since he did basically paint a target on his back with his actions. So, it seems reasonable to assume that scum are in on that vote. Well, less of an assumption and more a fact since majority was 10.
The votes that stick out the most to be are
red ranger (Voted Goldar to push more people to 3 votes)
alpha 5 (Didn't want to switch initially because they wanted to avoid a rush of votes. In reality there was 30 minutes left.)
bulk (Justified it as wanting to turbo to 'annoy the mods')
Black Rangers vote sticks out as well but I'd need to reread their posts on Goldar first.
Right now, based on the votes, Red Ranger looks the worst to me. We'll see how the day evolves.
Vote: Red Ranger
Both Green and Alpha try to paint Red as the one that was at least indirectly responsible for the Goldar lynch. Alpha's post, in particular, is very odd since he specifies that Red's vote pushed things into a 3-way tie...I agree that the Red Ranger's vote that pushed things to a 3-way tie is one of the most suspect votes in the final stretch of Day 1. A three-way tie is a pretty advantageous position for scum, since it gives them plenty of opportunity to either nudge the vote in the direction they desire or just let town tip the scales in a new way.
Are you saying you think Black Ranger and I could be scum together?
So,,, you would rather get lynched today, instead of having your vote used against you and be lynched tomorrow? I don't see how that logic works out.You mean vote for self preservation? Honestly the way I see it is, voting for that, people say "We'll understand" but I'm almost certain it would be used against you during vote analysis in which case, the same outcome happens. You'll be argued against for voting to save yourself and if you don't vote to save yourself.
I'm sure some will call that BS but I'm sure I've seen this happen before.
Not that I want to defend Rita because I do want her lynched, but I think it’s just a stylistic choice that it’s not capitalized. This would fit in with her other posts
I...
I thought that this exact sort or syntax quippling was the reason that they banned the quoting of role PMs. I don't find it to be a very useful form of analysis, since I don't think you asked Rita for specific capitalization.
If we end up not lynching Rita I think the only other choice is Black.
You mean vote for self preservation? Honestly the way I see it is, voting for that, people say "We'll understand" but I'm almost certain it would be used against you during vote analysis in which case, the same outcome happens. You'll be argued against for voting to save yourself and if you don't vote to save yourself.
I'm sure some will call that BS but I'm sure I've seen this happen before.
~~ The post below will probably be more useful later in the game ~~
Jason was making an effort to cast doubt on Red/rac very early on D2.
I noticed this when Jason piggybacked a question Black made towards rac.
rac's post was very clearly directed at Alpha. Black seemed confused by it, and Jason took that opportunity to jump at rac as well.
I then jumped back through that conversation and found something I think is interesting:
Both Green and Alpha try to paint Red as the one that was at least indirectly responsible for the Goldar lynch. Alpha's post, in particular, is very odd since he specifies that Red's vote pushed things into a 3-way tie...
When, in reality, it was Yellow who had done that earlier.
Jason's attack on Red would've cleared Red as town in my eyes if Red hadn't already done that himself.
Meanwhile, both Green and Alpha keep pushing against Red throughout the entire phase, but they don't put down votes.
Alpha seems bothered by Red's push against them on #935, and talks about voting Red (but doesn't actually do it) throughout the phase, like on #1125 and #1255. On #1228, Alpha says they want people to vote Red, but doesn't do it either.
(@rac you pushed pretty hard against Alpha on D2. How do you feel about them now?)
Green is the one who actually starts the pushback against Red that ended up with them becoming rac, but they never put down a vote on Red. They compalin about Red's vote on #1402, and then again on #1409.
Black is the first to vote Red, followed by myself, Rita, and then, finally, Alpha.
When the push against Red backfires, Jason distances themselves from it, seemingly noticing the inevitability of their lynch, and asks for scrutiny on the Red train on #1471. They finally vote Black (more on that in the last post of this series). But they also make sure to say they are "giving Green a pass" for the push, despite the fact that it was Green who goaded the rest into the train (#1492).
The constant nodding in the direction of Red without actual commitment from both Green and Alpha make them look really bad. They've both climbed up in my scum-reads list.
Random notes:
- Jason seems to indicate that they really thought Finster was a PR on #879.
- Bulk's push against Jason seems even more honest on D2 (#1018).
- White's and Yellow's D2 votes against Jason have really good timing, and make me feel better about them.
I'm tempted switch my vote to Black Ranger now because I feel like he's "slipping away" in terms of suspicions while I'm sure we'll continue talking about both Rita and Zordon tomorrow. On the other hand, Rita already claimed and everything, so we know we're not getting any more useful info from then and they did claim a very convenient role we can't confirm until we get their flip so eh
Before their vote, the lead was Jason 4, Black 2, Trini 1.well White Ranger, My day 1 reads have changed. Heck my reads from earlier this day phase has changed. Rita never really responded to me on why they believe Trini is scum, but after rereading the thread It is these posts that led me to Scum read Trini. The defense between voting for her vs voting for Goldar doesn't come down to "I'm town, don't vote me out" it comes down to "that's a cowardly vote, you are scum". Which strikes me the wrong way, when I believed Trini day 1 it was before seeing those. Now I'm convinced she is scum
Vote: Trini [\highlight]
I've been on and off during this day phase, sorry. I've had a ton of stuff to do this last couple of days (I took time off work to handle some matters) so yeah. I still think I've posted enough that people should know where I stand on most things though.I never felt like I was defending Jason. I just didn't see Bulk doing much else (and in fact where is he?) and I was curious why that seemed to be his biggest line of thought other than the stuff with you and Black Ranger, but since a few people read it that way I guess that's fair.
~~ The post below will probably be more useful later in the game ~~
Jason was making an effort to cast doubt on Red/rac very early on D2.
I noticed this when Jason piggybacked a question Black made towards rac.
rac's post was very clearly directed at Alpha. Black seemed confused by it, and Jason took that opportunity to jump at rac as well.
I then jumped back through that conversation and found something I think is interesting:
Both Green and Alpha try to paint Red as the one that was at least indirectly responsible for the Goldar lynch. Alpha's post, in particular, is very odd since he specifies that Red's vote pushed things into a 3-way tie...
When, in reality, it was Yellow who had done that earlier.
Jason's attack on Red would've cleared Red as town in my eyes if Red hadn't already done that himself.
Meanwhile, both Green and Alpha keep pushing against Red throughout the entire phase, but they don't put down votes.
Alpha seems bothered by Red's push against them on #935, and talks about voting Red (but doesn't actually do it) throughout the phase, like on #1125 and #1255. On #1228, Alpha says they want people to vote Red, but doesn't do it either.
(@rac you pushed pretty hard against Alpha on D2. How do you feel about them now?)
Green is the one who actually starts the pushback against Red that ended up with them becoming rac, but they never put down a vote on Red. They compalin about Red's vote on #1402, and then again on #1409.
Black is the first to vote Red, followed by myself, Rita, and then, finally, Alpha.
When the push against Red backfires, Jason distances themselves from it, seemingly noticing the inevitability of their lynch, and asks for scrutiny on the Red train on #1471. They finally vote Black (more on that in the last post of this series). But they also make sure to say they are "giving Green a pass" for the push, despite the fact that it was Green who goaded the rest into the train (#1492).
The constant nodding in the direction of Red without actual commitment from both Green and Alpha make them look really bad. They've both climbed up in my scum-reads list.
Random notes:
- Jason seems to indicate that they really thought Finster was a PR on #879.
- Bulk's push against Jason seems even more honest on D2 (#1018).
- White's and Yellow's D2 votes against Jason have really good timing, and make me feel better about them.
Before their vote, the lead was Jason 4, Black 2, Trini 1.
And yet, instead of voting Black and making it a close race between the two of them, Jason put a vote on Trini.
i need to re-read over it, but..
still waiting to hear why @Tommy wasn't on the JAAASON lynch
i think him, alpha 5, and zordon are suspicious. dunno if they're all scum tho
I've looked through everything, but I don't have anything specific on Kimberly apart from what I'd already mentioned yesterday:Hey @Zack in your rereads have you looked at Kimberly's posts on Jason?
- Kimberly: Also created a new train on Tommy (#631) instead of piggybacking on a realistic alternative to Jason when the votes were piling up on them, but ended up voting Trini making it Trini 5, Jason 3 on EoD.
This feels so forced.Shit that does make me look bad. Damn you Jason! Laugh it up scum. I'm sure Town will win this... probably
I'm concerned that Billy hasn't put down a vote yet. Where are you buddy?
This feels so forced.
I'm looking back at her because her comment on Black Ranger clicked something for me and I'm seeing lowkey shade on Jason voters and a whole lot of questions without conclusions. Quite a presence in the thread but very little taking of stands and almost no progression either. Just engagement but engagement that doesn't go anywhere and I don't think she's been under any real scrutiny either so it's raising my hairs a bit.I've looked through everything, but I don't have anything specific on Kimberly apart from what I'd already mentioned yesterday:
She also complained about Trini's D1 vote on Jason (#669), but I also thought that the trust thing was weird at the time.
Do you have anything in mind?
Noooo don't go back to this defeatist stuff D:Shit that does make me look bad. Damn you Jason! Laugh it up scum. I'm sure Town will win this... probably
Noooo don't go back to this defeatist stuff D:
You're supposed to want to live.
I had a vote on Red the whole day? You even quote the post with my vote.
Literally how unless you skipped posts?i feel more confident in scummy zordon then i do scummy black ranger, tbh
but this is probably bias speaking because i've read more of zordon
Literally how unless you skipped posts?
black ranger has been a drag in my mind, and i'm gut scum reading you you scum-face-in-a-jar.
I think you link is incorrect, since it just links back to a post you made on the last page. If it supposed to indicate anything more, it isn't clear.Both Green and Alpha try to paint Red as the one that was at least indirectly responsible for the Goldar lynch. Alpha's post, in particular, is very odd since he specifies that Red's vote pushed things into a 3-way tie...
When, in reality, it was Yellow who had done that earlier.
Sorry Rita's mind :( I don't mean to be a drag.
don't apologize
i'd still lynch you.
Not necessarily. I do think that there is at least one scum between you two.Are you saying you think Black Ranger and I could be scum together?
Not necessarily. I do think that there is at least one scum between you two.
I understand that there are possible reasons for you (or anyone else) to suspect Red at that time. What makes it feel off is the fact that scum!Jason also seemed content to cast doubt at Red but not a vote. You mentioned Red a lot throughout the phase, and even seemed annoyed when they threw back some accusations at you.I think you link is incorrect, since it just links back to a post you made on the last page. If it supposed to indicate anything more, it isn't clear.
And you are misunderstanding or mischaracterizing my argument here. I was saying that Red and Green were the ones who pushed the Goldar lynch just as the Jason lynch train was beginning to fall apart. This ultimately ahifted momentum from a Trini vs Jason lynch to a Trini vs Goldar lynch. I used the vote tool readout at the end of Day 1 as the basis of my arguments, so if anyone made any unofficial votes, it didn't factor into my analysis at the time.
I thought that both Red and Green looked scummy as a result. In fact my vote was on Green, because other factors from Day 1 and 2 made him look somewhat scummier.
My vote temporarily shifted from Green to Res for two simple reasons: the Green lynch clearly wasn't happening and the Red one had a shot. Obviously Red ended up not being scum, but I was still scum reading him strongly until the Rac reveal.
I still kinda think Green is scum.
No, how have you read more of me than the top poster?? What are you even saying?black ranger has been a drag in my mind, and i'm gut scum reading you you scum-face-in-a-jar.
Sounds like reason enough to go back and read through their posts again... if I survive the night.I'm looking back at her because her comment on Black Ranger clicked something for me and I'm seeing lowkey shade on Jason voters and a whole lot of questions without conclusions. Quite a presence in the thread but very little taking of stands and almost no progression either. Just engagement but engagement that doesn't go anywhere and I don't think she's been under any real scrutiny either so it's raising my hairs a bit.
Rita, you're not really fighting your impending lynch, have you resigned yourself to it, or do you think maybe there's time still and a good chance that the lynch will go another way? I don't see much in the way of protest, just some shade at Zordon and Black, but that's not much different from how you've played all game.
no, i haven't resigned myself to it. in fact, i want to fight it.
but i'm having extreme difficulty focusing right now due to sleep issues in real life.
sorry, it's completely out of characater for me as a player :(
I'm not mentally ready to consider suspicion towards you, but this feels forced and is pretty cliche'd IMO :P maybe something to note if we're past plan C.Sounds like reason enough to go back and read through their posts again... if I survive the night.
My vote is currently in Zordon, so yes.So once I flip town, you're gonna go after Zordon?
I was annoyed because Red wasn't putting a vote down himself. I thought it was scummy behavior.I understand that there are possible reasons for you (or anyone else) to suspect Red at that time. What makes it feel off is the fact that scum!Jason also seemed content to cast doubt at Red but not a vote. You mentioned Red a lot throughout the phase, and even seemed annoyed when they threw back some accusations at you.
Yeah I'm going to vote, most likely for Rita.@Blue Ranger you've not voted today. Gonna vote?
Also @Billy but we've not seen them around much at all. Just like the old Billy so :(
This is a weird thing to say.If I survive the day, I'll probably survive the night. No way can I be NK'd.
Unless I get Finster'd
This is a weird thing to say.