melonrabbit
The only good kind of melon
feels like a repeat of before.What do you find insincere about it
feels like a repeat of before.What do you find insincere about it
I took no real offense.Also to melon: No offense on my comment and also I like the Saw vote but I'm not going to follow you yet. Chuggs giving some performative heat to Muffin and then immediately chasing off Saw instead still leaves me in the same place that no one is meaningfully pushing Muffin and I want to read his slot.
She's becoming mine too :)this is legit my second strongest scum read in the game i can't
Chuggs I am just disappointed that you said you were gonna show me how it was done and apply some pressure and sneeks seems anything but pressured rn
And I'm left to wonder why ....
Where did I say this?Melon I cannot sit down and make Neeks post this is absurd
I don't understand this reference.I feel like Chuggs gets 10x as mad here as he ever would falling down in Peak
Where did I say this?
Chuggs the majority of this day has been the Ty discussion. I have to go through that to get reads on them lol. and i hate to break it to you but the reads are being colored by that 'slip' talk.See this makes me think you're scum struggling to force reads. There's a lot that's happened in this game outside the Ty stuff and people have formed reads based on that. I'm not sure why you're having so hard of a time here.
Give me your thought on Fran, Muffin, Melon, Turms, HP, and Nat and lets go from there
chuggs just come over to my place and sit next to me until i postMelon I cannot sit down and make Neeks post this is absurd
that's because chuggs is actually good at Peak. unlike mafiaI feel like Chuggs gets 10x as mad here as he ever would falling down in Peak
Stop with this timing >:(chuggs just come over to my place and sit next to me until i post
That's harsh, ouch >_>that's because chuggs is actually good at Peak. unlike mafia
You asked me to vote for sneeks so you could apply pressure. Based on what I've witnessed tonight that hadn't happened and I'm trying find out if that's coming from sneeks side or you.Then I really don't get what you're wanting here. I'm going to step away for a bit
lolHP; outside of my fireblend gut read, i think HP is my strongest town read imo. He brings Ty back into the light but in a way that feels very genuine and that he wanted to know what was going on there. I don't think Scum does that on D1 (as opposed to Turm, who slyly pushes it after HP) and his posts seem fine. would not kill today.
Stop with this timing >:(
he knows i mean it with love <3That's harsh, ouch >_>
That's absolutely not true.You don’t talk as much as he has been if you’re scum.
Can you explain this reasoning?No reason to vote him now because of how ingrained he is with the game already
Can you give me some reads
Sure. Gonna reread the thread quick.chuggs beat me to it so, same pls.
It’s more true than it is false in my opinion. Plus you disregarded the rest of my post. Still don’t think it’s good to get rid of the most active person day 1. Feels more like targeting Chuggs for who he is than it is actual sound logic.That's absolutely not true.
for the 3-way mini tie?
it would be funny. also chuggs scares me. i also didnt have terribly strong feelings on anyone and figured it might've shaken something out.
I jokingly said this to chuggs but being honest here, I don't know what it is you want. It's Day 1 and it's not like I have a flip or anything to look at here to make reads and guesses. I kinda have to overanalyze and hope it's right in order to get some kind of basis going to read others. I also have my own alignment to make reads and I'm planning to look at who shaded me earlier too since I know I can work off of that but that's really it.
Bro I have one vote and two different people are saying I'm giving performative heat to another player what do you want me to do here lmfao
Oh ok, you've got it already, nevermind.hey hey im doing the 'frustrated and not sure what you want' thing right now. wait your turn
I took no real offense.
I also agree that chuggs is more informational flip of the two.
Most engagement with the game is running through Chuggs right now. I don’t find it valuable to take that out of the game on Day 1. I also just…don’t think he’s scum.Can you explain this reasoning?
Prehaps.I'm not sure you understood my post or maybe I'm not understanding yours. I've already said that I think Chuggs is a bad flip today even if I believe he might still be scum. My thoughts on that are on the last page or just look at TWE's post on this page, same reasoning. I was saying I want Muffin to post more and be pressured so I can read Muffin's slot better.
This is libel.Sure. Gonna reread the thread quick.
Note: This reads are for posts made before 11:00 PM CST.
Slight town read
Natiko - his post have been few. But he has been analyzing player behavior on this thread rather than relying too much on meta knowledge. It gives me a good feel.
Fireblend - hasn't posted as much as some of the others, but most of his serious posts feel like trying to feel out the game without being overtly rash, which is something that feels town to me for the moment.
Francomp - I do feel that he is playing actively and prodding people for questions and to talk about the game. Though I'm not sure I follow the scumNeeks logic.
melonrabbit - Has been fairly active and has pushed towards the Saw vote while at the same time being aggressive towards Chuggs. I do feel like they are town.
Neutral read
Chuggernaut - the most active player on the game, and the one that thus has the most reaction and engagement out. As I said before, this is NAI for me.
Sorian - Same as Chuggs. H is the most active and has many interactions with Chuggs. For what is worth, I don't see them being a team right now. This level of interaction would probably pull too much attention to them on day one and I don't think scum would try to do something like this.
Geno - Joined later during day 1 guns blazing and going straight for Ty's jugular. Seems to have locked in on flipping Ty and honestly, his reasoning seems similar to mine in that I don't really buy 100% the excuse for the slip. However, this is NAI for me atm.
Sawneeks - Started quiet and seemingly making catch up comments and now is analyzing more. Dunno; I have to read her posts with more care.
Alexem - Not much to say here. Has been somewhat active but most of his earlier posts were about experiences in other games and hismre recent posts are mostly seeing if a flip on ty gives them info on me. Could behonest town, could be trying to pocket bu I can't be sure on this one.
The Wizard - Mostly reading null from him. He has been mostly discussing and throwing ideas with Chuggs, prodding Sorian, Alex and em and defending Ty. I do not think that he is scum and his back and forth at least is making headway in the game.
HPSauce - Has posted regularly, but his posts give me nothing to generate an opinion. His gun post at the very least gave us something to talk about for a bit.
CaptainNuevo - rereading his posts, nothing really stood out to me save for possibly larping squall, which is mostly fluff. Perhaps leaning towards scum depending on how it develops.
NeutralGroup or neutral read:
Ty4on - For some reason I can't let this one go. Mostly going with my gut but I don't buy 100% the explanation. I might be totally wrong with this one though.
Slight scum read
TheWorthyEdge -Leaning towards slight scum read. It's not the fact that he has little posts, but that he hasn't said anything that is remotely analyzing the game save for repeating Sorian's statement on turm. This feels like coasting to me.
turmoil7 - So far seems like he is sheeping on some comments, so he gets a side-eye from me, but since it appears that in past games it has lead to nithing I'm willing to let this one be for now.
Muffin - Same as TWE. Pretty much has given nothing so far and has justified it in that it is his posting style for now.
Null. Haven't seen them enough to form an opinion on their behavior
malus
Zippedpinhead
nin1000
Null. Don't know what to make of him given the lack of activity and their randomness.
Blargonaut
Also still don't getting good vibes off of Geno, probably a good combination of the voting behaviour here and some of his reactions. I wanna vote there.
VOTE: Geno
Do take into account that I started doing these reads over 2 hours ago. I still have to catch up with your more recent posts.This is libel.
Did it? It was just standard memeing.HPSauce - Has posted regularly, but his posts give me nothing to generate an opinion. His gun post at the very least gave us something to talk about for a bit.
Feels accurate to me.This is libel.
But like yall gotta stop calling me town. I've worked very hard for this reputation.Did it? It was just standard memeing.
That said this felt more real that other read lists.
Interesting.Feels accurate to me.
I'm not joking or being snarky with this when I say that sounds like a lot of mental work I'm not prepared to do right now, sorry.I want you to elaborate. The rest of your answers the last hour are just you being snarky. This is at least a vote even if there is no real reasoning included. Don't give me the softball answers either, I don't want a vague notion about him tunneling Ty or being hyper focused on the slip, show me the actual reactions you saw that you didn't like and why.
e flip him, it’s useless and we lose not only the leading contributor to the game BUT a potential indicator moving forward. If Chuggs decides to pare it back moving forward he’s sketch, if he decides to keep up the high post count…he will say something he shouldn’t if he’s scum. Do not kill
anyway captain ignored me again so im keeping the vote there
[Quistis more like]Find your inner Rinoa and then maybe he'll notice.
did you answer the 'who would you shoot if you had a gun' question?
I'm noticing you get close to have a read on people but then talk yourself out of it at the last minute. It feels like you have no reads, honestly. Or like you're scared to give a read that has bit of spine to it.
Also still don't getting good vibes off of Geno, probably a good combination of the voting behaviour here and some of his reactions. I wanna vote there.
VOTE: Geno
[He/Him] CaptainNuevo|Captain - UTC+9 - Squall. I feel like I might be picking up what he's putting down now that I reread stuff but my goodness, please help solve. You're either lying just to keep living or there's something else and I worry this goes until Day 3 and we're back looking at you. If you're town, please make it more obvious.
Planning on itInteresting.
(Is this currently your pick for end of day then?)
Acknowledged.Planning on it
Need to hear Ty’s reasoning for saying what he did. I agree that it was a slip rather than not knowing the mechanics. I for one didn’t read the rules at all and thus had no reason to think XP was shareable. Clearly he did. So there, hm hm!
Morning, all. No question that Ty's got some explaining to do after that sharing comment. With no explicit statement about it in the rules, that's a strange thing to come out with unprompted without a doubt. I think there's some sense to Neon's suggestion that pooling could be a thing for scum or for grouped players (lovers/neighbours/cultits etc.), although I'm not sure that the latter theory meshes with the game mechanics - when abilities need to be earned with XP, would that allow for passive abilities as well? I suppose somebody could get a passive in place of a tier one move, forcing them to wait to unlock their active roles, but I'd expect grouping to be more related to an unlocked ability. (For example, an neighbour or mason could unlock the ability to pick a partner before they get added to a chat.)
To go back to the earlier point about experience for votes, I agree that we need to be careful not to rush into voting someone out just to be on the leading train for the sake of getting XP. That line of thinking can easily lead to mis-hits. Given the additional XP for discovering areas on even days, you can accrue XP at a reasonable rate over time, so it might be better to treat voting XP as a bonus. I can see that there might be an incentive to go for the voting points if your tier three unlock is greatly more useful than the tier one and two unlocks, but I think it would be a big risk to hold out for the big unlock and possibly miss out on two actions in the process.
Ah, I see Ty gave his reasoning while I was writing my post. I absolutely get that it can be easy to misread instructions, I think that's something we can all do from time to time. Still, I can't quite make the connection from 'exchange experience points for one of your available abilities' to exchanging points with other players - I don't know where that part could have come from.
It could well have been an honest mistake, but under the circumstances and given the wording of the instruction, that jump to concluding it's for sharing experience makes me feel uneasy. Counterpoint, though - if, for the sake of argument, Ty's got access to another chat, would it not make more sense for him to clarify there?
This is a slip, it has to be, it makes sense for scum to have an extra rule to share XP to execute abilities, I mean why not?
Ty says he misread the rule that says exchange XP for an ability, there's no world where this is misread as "share XP between players"
Vote: Ty4on
i should've asked why you scum read me.I'll try to check in tomorrow morning before deadline. Still leaning towards scum being in chuggs, sneeks and HP group. Would also lean scum on TWE. Fran and neon I both sorta like. Sorian seems more towny than anything else at the moment.
idk what cap is doing but I'm interested to see where that goes on d2.
Everyone else is always sleep when I'm playing so really feels like we aren't in the same game which makes me sad.
I would like to hear more from nin and interested in what 4D chess blarg is playing with Amazon reviews.
ngl, i'm also not a huge fan of the Geno vote. is it just vibes? what about turm and ty? i know you town lean on me and there are several one off votes (alexem, sorian, chuggs, TWE, i guess blarg) but he's still so random to go for.I'm not joking or being snarky with this when I say that sounds like a lot of mental work I'm not prepared to do right now, sorry.
Feels like genuine investigation.For me it is more that I town lean on Ty and your post sets you up to turn a town flip from Ty into more scum reads in a way that scum will sometimes set up. When I looked at it felt more like filler scum will generate to mention a few names and keep their head above water for doing more than nothing but it didn't really hold up to scrutiny. This can be because you were sleepy or it can be inauthentic and you wanted to look good more than solve.
Also this neutral speculation is a red flag for me, as scum are often eager to solve neutrals (the only part of the game they can solve alongside town)
---
I don't love this answer, it seems really wishy-washy and I don't come away with a clear sense of what you actually think of the players mentioned.
Insinuating role fishing from obvious joke posts, I don't know. Feels like trying to manufacture content....
(Where am I? Am I awake? Why does my head hurt?)
(How long have I been asleep?)
[NORMAL TALK]
Since it looks like night time talk is going to happen at... inconvenient times for me to catch up, I wanna let one thing be known now, roughly 23 hours in advance:
I'm unlikely to be able to move my vote around at day's end with full information. I'll keep my vote where I think it's best tonight, and catch up when I can in the morning, but it's gonna be rough due to the deluge of info.
[/NORMAL TALK]
...Whatever.
(Some people positing that scum sharing exp could make sense to balance things for them. I disagree with this notion. Assuming scum has a similar role PM to the information I have, I have to assume scum has 3 abilities each, with successively increasing xp costs. Pooling experience for them feels like it would be imbalanced. Maybe this is important? Maybe it's not. At THIS PHASE probably not.)
...I can't really be bothered.
(Some players yesterday were asking me questions about my "Squall-isms", in a way that felt somewhat role fishing. THAT SAID, neither of them arise as logical questions from the publicly available information we have (the sample PM). That PM has only xp abilities, and someone asked me if I had to type "...whatever" once per page for my role. Based on the publicly available information, and the information I have about my role, I don't see reason to believe that roles exist outside of the powers we have. Feels like a fishing question, and it's something that raised an eyebrow for me.)
Hardly feels worth it.
(Furthermore, the sample PM also does nothing to indicate anything about role names here. I was asked if my role was specifically Squall. That's a jump to make based on the lack of information about role names present publicly. Also rubs me a bit the wrong way.)
This vote feels Towny af.I don't like chuggs yesterday or today
But I do like chuggs slightly (smidge territory) more than HP.
Idk if I feel like chuggs v sorian or chuggs v sneeks is more fake.
I feel like flipping sneeks gives very little rn now since she is giving us very little rn
and HP is my Aerith stan bro-in-arms
making Chuggs the common denominator among them.
VOTE: Chuggs
Bang. Or whatever.
how does not Ty but yes to Turm resolve anything?Super didn’t have time to read after all, c’est la vie. Unless there’s been developments I’m unaware of, I still wouldn’t vote Ty. Would vote turm though. Alexem is tempting but doesn’t resolve anything.
Hang onSo hold on, I went and took a shower and was re-thinking about the posts I read and realized that this one is weird. I very specifically said his behavior was NOT like a phoenix wright villain. Yes, I did purposely drill down into Chuggs to see what would shake loose but why are you misrepresenting what I said about his reaction? At best, this is another case of sloppy reading and at worst, you are trying to paint a world about me.
Ok, I did misread that, but I still don't feel great about it. I just don't empathize with expecting Chuggs to completely ignore a vote on him.I have definitely seen Chuggs get a scum read and say “ok cool” and then move on with his day. I’m not saying he’s having a Phoenix wright breakdown over here but I went into this vote expecting to get ignored so I’m just more surprised that I’m getting this much back and forth
Your reason for scum reading me is primarily based on the fact that Chuggs interjected into a conversation I was having with Neon is that fair to say?I don't believe that sneeks has had much to say about hp at all. And she and chuggs spent the day playing at scum reading each other. Chuggs being so quick to call hp being town over hp's reaction/calling ty felt weird. And I didn't not like their mirroring answers as already discussed (felt like a prepared response).
Says Chuggs is defensive for D1, Chuggs asks him, ok what about the other 19. He says he doesn't knowThe read that floats to the top of my mind in recent hours funnily enough is that you are strangely defensive in general for a D1.
I dunno yet mostly
In truth, I want to no vote, which I don’t think I have done since WDIOTL, but I know that is not how this process works.
I completely get wanting to look at coasters,
I mean, the Turmoil wagon was literally in the lead at that time...Reading around the room:
- That leaves Nin, Malus and Zipped. I thought Nin looked OK early on, but he's gone quiet since. Malus has popped up occasionally and I see he's just checked in, so I don't think I've got anything too concrete to tie to him now - I wasn't keen on the Turmoil vote, but I can see the sense in pressuring Cap, just as long as that's not for the sake of abandoning a wagon that's not taken off. Zipped left a impression on me of looking engaged right at the start, but that doesn't tie up with his activity or the contents of those posts. Could be trying to fly low, but it could also be IRL limitations - either way, though, if he stays in the game, he needs to speak up more.
I think the mechanics make easy to justify(for scum) an early hammer by saying they wanted the exp the next day.
I think we should agree to not hammer without wide consensus by the town
Fran looking at mechanics is typical Fran behavior but slightly town lean for me(disclaimer I don't think I have ever played with scum Fran)
Sorian wanting to do his own thing even if it could damage the town is classic Sorian too - null (neutral?)
Chuggs following suit seemed a bit weird to me, smelled a bit as trying to overdo the town act to me - slight scum read
VOTE: Chuggs
I buy Ty's explanation regarding his exp slip
Honestly the game focusing so much on Ty's slip makes me think scum is happy with this state of the game, leading me to think Ty is town
Am I making a mistake?the rules of the game are a bit confusing, I know myself I have read them several times to get them, getting them wrong is NAI to me. I am not saying Ty can't be scum, just that people piling on him for this seems weird to me.
I agree with you that a first glance my vote on Chuggs seems weird, but if you read carefully that stage of the game you may see that several were trying to make a thing of the ty-slip(a nothing burger imho), to me Chuggs was trying to make it happen too by keeping attention on it instead of letting it slide as the attention moved to the next thing the best offense is a good defense let's say.
I think I feel a bit better about Sneeks. Not a lot much because I feel that she had to be pushed to participated in the game but I don't think she would be in a "would lynch today" list. I think she would be in a "I don't know. Review later" kinda spot.
On the other side I feel worse about Muffin. He was also being pressed for some work and he still didn't do much. Very low under the radar. I also don't like how when he said who would he shoot he went for the meta angle instead of focusing on what's going on here. It's the easy answer to give (and it also bothers me because I was one of the targets). I would move him to scum and I could vote for him today.
I'm surprised that Capt just has an only vote right now. Let's put him into contention and see if we can get something from that spot:
vote: CaptainNuevo
@CaptainNuevo I agree that D1 are hard but there was a lot of talking today. You must have at least some feelings on people. Share them with us to see where you are at.
@Sorian and i guess @Chuggernaut too but mostly Sorian.
You lamented earlier that too many people were being coy with Ty during the whole thing and I'm curious what you make of the people who did actually call Ty's post a 'slip' with confidence and didn't dance around it.
They are TWE, Alexem, and Geno. And only one of them made their post with a vote. Alexem made a vote after Geno did much later.
I think I’ve been pretty open that I didn’t find any merit to the Ty slip being a real slip and that I don’t scum read them for it, but that I felt some of the reactions to it would be informative. Of those reactions I found Wizard, Turm, and Febe to be the ones I liked the least. I’ve warmed up on Febe some since then, but the other two not so much. Meanwhile flipping Alexem I don’t think really resolves anything around Ty’s slip or the reactions to it. I haven’t read like 2ish pages though so by all means if I’m missing something let me know - I’m not against being reasoned with.how does not Ty but yes to Turm resolve anything?
It's small but I like that Fran is inviting in discussion here, the boredom feels towny to me like someone on their own. I find Fran tough to read cause to me their play is pretty similar as either alignment but points for this.Also Fanto isn't here and someone needs to do a list. I would be happy to discuss any name if someone wants to (I'm just bored).
To me those reads feel pretty safe and consensus-y. (I haven't checked if he was early on any of them)I like that he shared some reads. Not a fan of his vote as I don't think that he will flip scum but I can see some reasoning for it. I have pushed for, what I considered, info flips D1 before when I didn't have a scum lean so I can see why he did it.
I think Zipped is comfortable in this range as either alignment, not mad at the pressure but I think a vote there would be low yield.Zipped is just fluff. Even the post where he analizes the game is just nothing:
At that point I hadn't seen the clarification Fran pulled so I thought there was a pretty real chance I had missed an extra rule. The rules here are pretty unusual and I already asked Hedin for clarification on how the voting rule works pre-game cause the way it was phrased felt ambiguous to me.This one did stand out a bit looking back for being so milquetoast. Like they wanted to be on the record of having interacted with the slip but is afraid to take a stance. Reads scummy to me kinda regardless of Ty’s alignment?
I agree with you Me looking at coasters is worthless. It was more i understand the general town sentiment to kill coasters day 1.As I said before No vote is a extra bad result today as besides not getting any flip and vote totals today we also don't gain xp so town would be unable to use any ability tonight.
I don't care much about you looking at coasters (but that's just my opinion and do it anyway if you want) but I would love to reads how you feel about Chuggs, Sorian, Captain, Turm and Alexem if you can, please. Give some some reads where the meat of the game is right now.
I feel like Neon is making some effort to be understood here even if it comes in response to pressure. His engagement with me was okay and has me cooling on him a little although I don't like the way he dropped his initial reads as half-baked when questioned on them instead of trying to sort through his actual view on the game.Sure. Gonna reread the thread quick.
Note: This reads are for posts made before 11:00 PM CST.
What's your netural case on Ty I don't see where that would come from?Neutral (aka would be fine killing but i dont think he's scum):
[He/Him] Ty4on|Ty - UTC+1 - His ‘Slip’ means he probably isn’t scum. Could be Neutral. Possible Town. His reads list is real bad tho and i still dont like how he didnt investigate those who focused on his 'slip'. (see; my big post)
I didn't know that's how you played, I would delete less. No ragrets.I don't think so, at least not consciously. I still try to be more active, write something up, second guess myself and delete again a lot.
More hedgey reads from Alex here, I want a firmer stance from him.Reading around the room:
(I'd like to see Blarg and Geno and Nin actually... contribute and post more. I'll chalk this up to time differences for the time being, but I hope to see some contributions from them when I wake up, or I'd be starting to push their feet to the flames in D2.)
To me those reads feel pretty safe and consensus-y. (I haven't checked if he was early on any of them)
chuggs and Sorian really feel like their typical town day 1. Alexem reads town as well.
Turm and Captain I’m getting weird vibes from
melons reads don't make much sense to me (I don't see whatever triangle in Chuggs-Sneeks-HP) but I do think they are on their own.
It bothers me that Sneeks post #291 on Sorian and Ty seems to lean scummy on Sorian but Sneeks today has no pressure on Sorian and pretty much omits mentioning Sorian until throwing them into a town-ish list.
I usually like Sneeks more than I have so far, the effort is coming through (reluctantly) but I also find it's the kind of content that is easy enough to fake as scum
i didnt posit sorian as Town there because him being Town in that scenario doesn't do anything to change my read of Ty. Basically, if Ty flips Town then Sorian could be Scum or Town. If Ty flips Scum then Sorian isn't scum. Reversing that and Sorian flipping first as either alignment leads to the same conclusions. It was also based around what Ty is because he is the main question. His alignment kinda helps shed light on others.
What’s the case on cap?
He's been around, but hasn't really tried to push the game forward.What’s the case on cap?
And it's basically just switching from one low hanging fruit to another low hanging fruit....I'm tired.
(I'm re-reading turm's stuff re my vote on him.)
(Ignoring meme posts at the start. Early on engages with fran here on discussing mechanics, and saying a non-controversial belief about how we should handle hammers for xp. This feels different enough from trying to persuade how we view vote movement I'll say it's fine).
Can I?
(Follows it up with this:)
(Interesting. A hard read early on, which later on picked up some level of pressure, and verbal push without actual votes from Sneeks)
(Some stuff re: ty slip)
Am I making a mistake?
(Eh. Y'know, I don't think my vote is in the right place today.)
Unvote
(I'm actually about to head to sleep since I'm in Japan. I'll be up around 40 minutes before end of day. So... uhhhh... this is awkward timing).
(ANYHOW. Sneeks got very verbal with a few people in a way that felt almost like tunneling but didn't put out a vote on them. Which is kinda odd given past behavior, but then again very few people put out votes.)
(I'd like to see Blarg and Geno and Nin actually... contribute and post more. I'll chalk this up to time differences for the time being, but I hope to see some contributions from them when I wake up, or I'd be starting to push their feet to the flames in D2.)
(Chuggs... feels genuinely frustrated at being called out earlier today. Town vibes.)
(Sorian is also less directive than previous. And quieter. Need to read him more).
(Me? I need xp.)
(I think the ty vote would give us more useful information than a lot of other options in the lead do right now, which is something I think we need D1. So...)
VOTE: Ty4on
...They're the same.
(Blarg said it was a breadcrumb. I think being excited at one of my bits potentially being game relevant, and then explaining WHAT IT IS, is actually part of the game.)
(Oh I missed an actual question for me. Why doesn't this site give me a color to highlight a quote on something I said?)
(My read on melon specifically: right now I don't feel like it's likely scum behavior. It's a little too overt. And thinking back on times I've played with scum!melon, I remember their behavior being a bit more reliant on chatting things over with the scum team. Is it possible they're more confident and less team-centered this phase/game? Sure. But I call it out because I found it interesting.)
Seifer?
(RE: Turm[?] mentioning Sephiroth that felt purely flavor text oriented at the time. I could go re-read it, but I think that re-reading it with that in mind is going to color my viewpoint enough that it would be inaccurate.)
(Other mechanics posters... I still think trying to drive consensus about how to read group vote behavior early on is a bit suss. I know the xp system is the big unique thing and it's interesting to think about how it might be used. But trying to be like "Look guys, we should all agree that someone voting to try to get XP is bad" pre-emptively feels like trying to setup a defense for not being on a vote in advance.)
I'll prove it.
(Some posts of that: 1. 2. 3. 4.)
(I'm not saying that in and of itself is enough to make me flag you as scum. But I am wary of it because it indicates a level of thought about how to balance getting XP without being flagged as bad).
I mean that response is still weird to me cause it feels like she didn't really want to talk about Sorian and only explored them in relation to Ty.I actually asked Sneeks about that and she said this:
Does this change your read on her?
What do you think of HPSauce's vote?I mean that response is still weird to me cause it feels like she didn't really want to talk about Sorian and only explored them in relation to Ty.
---
I think Alexem's vote has the least conviction of what I've seen so far and his reads don't make me feel better. I think that's a solid pick for today.
Vote: Alexem
---
I'm starting work now I'll try to dip in and out between now and EoD but I don't expect to read a bunch more of the day.
That's just how I have fun.Melon is the most vibes based one but the rapid posting and alternating between joke comments and kind of responding to what's happening but in a sort of superficial way of the last two pages doesn't sit super right with me. I also disagree with her scum team.
Idk what to tell you ur association with Chuggs doomed you in my eyes. I already said it was less what you said but how you both said and the timing of it that stuck out to me. It felt like a canned response that was pre-discussed.Your reason for scum reading me is primarily based on the fact that Chuggs interjected into a conversation I was having with Neon is that fair to say?
Why would Chuggs involve himself in that conversation if we were scum together? That makes little to no sense to me.
this is such a lazy votevote: Captain
Sorry, I know this breaks the be nice to Captain rule but being most of the day with only RPing stuff and a "meme vote" on me sussed me out
Turmoil keeps voting for people that I suspect too and then it spooks me a bit because I don't like Turmoil much this game.
----
I was reading Fireblend's post and when he said Sneeks vs. Chuggs, I found it interesting that Chuggs has been in two high profile fights today. On the one hand, it almost makes me want to lean back towards the town side of things because I just don't think he makes himself that high profile as scum but the elephant in the room is he didn't start either of those fights, he was forced into it by me and then by a combo of melon and Saw. It's really just NAI but I wanted to put thoughts to writing.
Can you elaborate on me flying under the radar?I'm never gonna play in a way yall like. I ain't here to please.
Febe - flying more under the radar that I would expect for Town!Febe.