Damn, Sue has a type.
Thanks for the clarification!
@Sorian If we lose the BP, I know we will be notified. But would we be notified who was targeted between the two of us?
I wouldve given it a shot. Maz going for Zipped in the ITA is what sealed his fate. He shouldve just let the possible lynch take care of it and killed someone else.We may not die tonight but if so, it HAS been fun. As for Mazre, I guess he felt people wouldn’t listen. And would they have?
And so it begins!
My phone battery is dying so I'll be gone for a while.
But I don't think Kawl is Mafia. And I don't think anybody I've interacted with is Mafia.
This Zeke v. Nat situation feels like town on town so I want to ignore it, but I know I'm going to have to do a reread anyway to see what the hell is actually going on.
Anyway, REALLY want to hop on Extreme Tactician for reasons I said before, but it'll only do so much if I go it alone. So I'll join the train on Mr. Runner-up.
[highlght]VOTE: Ynnek[/highlight]
Anyone else want to put the heat on E.T., just hit ya boy up.
You never clarified it?I will say that I had something happen to me during the last night phase, but since it's pretty NAI I didn't think it was that important or useful to bring up.
Post about me on why Saw lied like i vanished after voting kawl, which i didnt
Click to go to post
https://www.outermafia.com/index.php?threads/186/page-29#post-27010Kill verelios before Zip, especially if Zip really is BP so that we can verify without having to hit twice. It makes the most sense.
The melon is a scum gladiator theory seems like a real stretch. IMO there are much better and much less risky ways to get town points without hoping for the scum team to rally a 50 player game to no lynch.
I really dunno. Honestly I think it could have been either of us - if I'm right about Lux and Ynnek, I could have been the target, and if you're on the right trick, might have been you. If the wrong one of us mentions it, it might reveal us. I was thinking about it myself because it's critical info related to the lack of deaths, but I don't want to give us away since killing two active players at once is a blow to town.@heymonkey
Should we mention a shot being taken at us? Obviously not both of us since that would alert ppl that we are lovers.
I thought about that. Then I thought scum would just assume someone else tried to kill me/you. They would assume another faction/neutral did it.I really dunno. Honestly I think it could have been either of us - if I'm right about Lux and Ynnek, I could have been the target, and if you're on the right trick, might have been you. If the wrong one of us mentions it, it might reveal us. I was thinking about it myself because it's critical info related to the lack of deaths, but I don't want to give us away since killing two active players at once is a blow to town.
We wouldnt come out as lovers btw. Just one of us would claim to have been attacked last night. I sorta tried to breadcrumb it in a post by saying 2..... at least two kill attempts last night. On second thought though, only thing learned by coming forward is that there is another killer. Hopefully whoever tried to killed us won't want to try 2 nights in a row. Especially with some of the other claims today.True. But also remember this - if we reveal, it makes us a huge target for ITAs.
We have some time before the first ITA, at least. But now that Gorlak has decided I'm scum (sigh, there's always someone), I might eat a shot, especially if they know we're vulnerable. And you might eat a shot because you've been aggressive.
I'm not saying we shouldn't reveal. I'm just putting thoughts out.
Yea I noticed.If it matters, I have breadcrumbed our relationship a couple of times.
someone should ITA Ezekel or heymonkey so we can uncover the, uh... what was the term I used to use? Social links? War bonds? Between them and their reads. They're better off flipped ASAP, IMO. Thanks
Also game mechanic question. Does a peeping tom/looking power not require someone to move and thus doesnt count as them visiting someone?